Empowering Patient Research Partners: A Guide to Decision-Making Frameworks in Patient-Oriented Research

Are you a young adult involved in patient-oriented research as a patient research partner? If yes, the power dynamics can sometimes feel overwhelming, especially when decisions are being made. This blog post is for you. We're going to explore decision-making frameworks specifically designed to balance power and give you a voice in patient-oriented research projects.

Table of Contents

  1. Consensus Decision-Making

  2. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

  3. Delphi Method

  4. Ethical Frameworks

  5. Participatory Decision-Making

Consensus Decision-Making

What is Consensus Decision-Making?

In patient-oriented research, consensus decision-making allows each stakeholder, including patient research partners, to have an equal say in research design, methodology, or outcomes.

Balancing Power

By allowing each member the ability to voice concerns and potentially veto proposals, this approach ensures that your perspectives are not sidelined.

How to Implement

Active participation in team meetings is crucial. Everyone discusses the pros and cons of various decisions until a choice is made that everyone can support.

Lay Description & Example

Picture a research project aiming to study medication effects. By using consensus decision-making, even if the medical experts propose a method, the patient research partners can ensure that patient comfort and ethics are also considered.

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

What is MCDA?

MCDA helps the team weigh various options against multiple criteria such as research validity, patient comfort, and cost.

Balancing Power

By incorporating criteria that reflect the concerns of patient research partners, MCDA reduces the dominance of medical professionals in decision-making.

How to Implement

You and the team set criteria and assign scores to different research methods or decisions. The option with the best score across all criteria wins.

Lay Description & Example

Imagine deciding between two research methods. One is faster but less comfortable for patients. MCDA allows you to score each method, ensuring that patient comfort is a vital consideration.

Delphi Method

What is the Delphi Method?

This method involves anonymous questionnaires aimed at achieving a collective decision.

Balancing Power

Anonymity allows for unbiased contributions, ensuring that medical professionals do not unduly influence the decision-making process.

How to Implement

Surveys are sent to all stakeholders, including you. After gathering data, the results are shared and the process is repeated until a consensus is reached.

Lay Description & Example

Think of it as a series of anonymous surveys about a research question or methodology. Since the responses are anonymous, you can express your opinion freely, leveling the playing field.

Ethical Frameworks

What are Ethical Frameworks?

These are principles that guide the ethical dimensions of patient-oriented research, like fairness and patient well-being.

Balancing Power

Ethical frameworks provide common ground rules that apply to everyone, ensuring ethical conduct over hierarchical influence.

How to Implement

When evaluating choices, always consider the ethical implications. Will the decision benefit the patients? Is it fair and just?

Lay Description & Example

It’s like a moral compass for research decisions. For instance, when selecting research participants, ethical frameworks ensure that the selection is fair and devoid of bias.

Participatory Decision-Making

What is Participatory Decision-Making?

This involves all stakeholders, including patient research partners, in the discussions and decision-making process.

Balancing Power

By engaging you directly in research discussions, this approach naturally balances power dynamics among all stakeholders.

How to Implement

Be an active participant in meetings or focus groups. Your voice and feedback are integral to making the right decisions.

Lay Description & Example

Imagine you’re part of a group deciding the key focus areas of upcoming research. Your insights can help steer the direction toward topics that genuinely matter to patients.

Understanding these frameworks can equip you with the tools to actively contribute to patient-oriented research. Your role as a patient research partner is not just tokenistic but central to the ethics and effectiveness of research. So, go ahead, make your voice heard and contribute to research that truly centers around the patient experience.

Previous
Previous

Addressing Power Dynamics and Hierarchies: Rationale for Providing a Decision-Making Checklist to Patient Research Partners

Next
Next

The Untapped Potential of Young Adults in Mental Healthcare Research